Brackett v. A.C. Lawrence Leather Co.

559 A.2d 776 (1989)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brackett v. A.C. Lawrence Leather Co.

Maine Supreme Judicial Court
559 A.2d 776 (1989)

Facts

On January 3, 1978, Jeffrey Brackett (plaintiff) suffered a back injury while employed with A. C. Lawrence Leather Co. (Lawrence) (defendant). Brackett was awarded total-disability benefits for four days after his back injury and from September 8, 1978, to January 15, 1979. Brackett returned to work full-time until he was injured again in two non-work-related accidents in 1985. Since then, Brackett had had back surgery and was totally incapacitated. Brackett filed a petition for restoration of 100 percent benefits. The hearing commissioner of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (the commission) granted Brackett’s petition, which was affirmed by the Appellate Division. The hearing commissioner found that the 1978 injury was causally connected to Brackett’s incapacity. Lawrence and its insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (Liberty) (defendant), appealed. Lawrence argued that Brackett’s total incapacity should be apportioned between his 1978 work-related injury and his two 1985 non-work-related injuries. To support its position, Lawrence argued that even though the commissioner found a causal connection, the commissioner also found that the 1985 injuries were probably major contributing factors to Brackett’s incapacity.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McKusick, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership