Bracy v. Gramley
United States Supreme Court
520 U.S. 899 (1997)
Bracy (defendant) was tried, convicted and sentenced to death before then-Judge Maloney, who himself was later convicted of conspiracy, racketeering, extortion, and obstructing justice in April 1993. Maloney had a long history of corrupt behavior, with numerous contacts to organized crime. Four months after Maloney’s conviction, Bracy filed a habeas corpus petition, claiming that he was denied a fair trial, since, “in order to cover up the fact that [Maloney] accepted bribes from defendants in some cases, [Maloney] was prosecution oriented in other cases.” That is, in order to camoflage his practice of taking bribes from defendants, sometimes Maloney, tilting the other way, went out of his way to favor the prosecution. Bracy alleges that this happened in his case. Bracy wanted to obtain discovery to support his claim. The district court denied both Bracy’s fair-trial claim and discovery request, saying that his allegations “contain insufficient specificity or good cause to justify further discovery.” The court of appeals affirmed, though the vote was divided. It said that Bracy had not shown “good cause” for discovery to prove his claim, pursuant to Habeas Corpus Rule 6(a). In the court’s view, even if Bracy found evidence that Maloney was biased against defendants who did not bribe him, it would not prove that he was biased in Bracy’s particular case. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.