From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
Bradbury v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
815 F.2d 1356 (1987)
Phillips Petroleum Company (Phillips) (defendant) conducted a three-year project exploring for uranium near Placerville, Colorado. The project involved drilling numerous holes to test subsurface minerals where landowners and mineral-rights owners gave Phillips permission. Phillips hired a survey company to locate the mining claims and Desert Drilling Company (DMC) to drill the holes. Phillips’s geologist, Cathy Suda, oversaw the operation. Phillips was supposed to confirm the surveys had located the mining claims correctly but evidently failed to do so. During the summers of 1979 and 1980, seven landowners claimed DMC employees trespassed on their land, causing property damage or escaped livestock. Phillips or DMC settled each claim by paying for the damage, with Phillips trying to maintain good public relations. Landowner Alan Bradbury (plaintiff) told DMC employees they were drilling on land belonging to his neighbor, Thom Panunzio (plaintiff) without permission and photographed them. The next day, Bradbury returned with a mineral-rights owner and maps, and Suda conceded they might be on the wrong land. When Bradbury took more photos, DMC employees demanded the film. Bradbury ran. DMC employees chased him onto his property and violently wrestled the camera away, causing injury. Panunzio and Bradbury sued for trespass, property damage, assault and battery, and outrageous conduct. At trial, the judge allowed evidence of the other claims Phillips had settled. The jury awarded Panunzio and Bradbury over $75,000 each. Phillips appealed, arguing that the judge should have excluded the settlements.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Barrett, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.