Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Bradley v. Hunter

Louisiana Court of Appeals
413 So.2d 674 (1982)


Facts

In May 1980, J.W. Bradley, a 28-year-old man, entered a restaurant owned by Ora Hunter, an 82-year-old woman. Ora’s 65-year-old daughter, Aurila Hunter (defendant), worked in the restaurant with her. Ora and Aurila were the only two employees. In the restaurant, J.W. requested a coke, but Aurila refused to serve him. Aurila had experienced issues with J.W. in the past and had told him not to come into the restaurant. Specifically, Aurila had been threatened by J.W. two weeks earlier after refusing to sell him beer. Ora offered J.W. the coke, but he refused and began to curse at and threaten Aurila. After J.W. left, Ora went outside to make sure he had gone. Aurila grabbed a gun kept under the counter and followed Ora onto the porch. On the porch, Aurila saw J.W. approaching and flailing his arms with clenched fists as he continued to make threats. Aurila threatened J.W. with the gun and warned him not to come any closer. Aurila fired a warning shot, but J.W. kept approaching. Aurila fired at J.W., striking him in the head and killing him. Susie Mae Bradley (plaintiff) brought a civil suit for wrongful death on behalf of J.W.’s four children (Bradley children) (plaintiffs). At trial, evidence was presented on J.W.’s history of criminal activity and tendency toward violence. The trial court granted Aurila’s motion for a directed verdict, finding that the doctrine of self-defense operated as a complete defense to Aurila’s claims. The Bradley children appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Cutrer, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.