Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Bradshaw v. Burningham

Utah Supreme Court
671 P.2d 196 (1983)


Facts

Wayne Burningham (defendant) hired Ronald Bradshaw (plaintiff) to drill a well for Burningham. Under the contract, Bradshaw was to receive $35 per foot for drilling the well. However, if Bradshaw ran into problems that slowed down the drilling process, Bradshaw was to receive $50 an hour instead. In fact, after he began drilling, Bradshaw ran into a metal object that prevented Bradshaw from completing the original well. Instead, Bradshaw drilled a well for Burningham in a different location. Burningham and Bradshaw entered a compromise agreement regarding how much Burningham owed for the first attempt. Under the compromise agreement, Bradshaw would receive $6,300 for the work done on the first well. The compromise agreement incorporated parts of the original contract and stated that the original contract held except for the changes the compromise agreement provided. When Burningham did not pay the $6,300, Bradshaw sued Burningham. Bradshaw asked the court to award damages based on the original contract’s rates rather than the compromise agreement’s $6,300. The trial court held that both parties were bound by the compromise agreement and awarded Bradshaw $6,300. Burningham appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Durham, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.