Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Brady v. National Football League

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
644 F.3d 661 (2011)


Facts

The National Football League (NFL) (defendant) held a non-statutory labor exemption from the Sherman Antitrust Act on account of the NFL Players Association’s (NFLPA) status as the collective bargaining representative union for NFL players. The NFL and NFLPA engaged in more than two years of negotiations on the parties’ next collective bargaining agreement (CBA). The NFL planned to lockout the players if the parties did not reach a new CBA. Before the CBA expired, the NFL players voted to disclaim the NFLPA as their collective bargaining representative. On the same day, Brady and other NFL players (players) (plaintiffs) brought an antitrust suit against the NFL, seeking a preliminary injunction enjoining the NFL from instituting the planned lockout. The players asserted that because they disclaimed the union, the NFL’s antitrust exemption no longer applied. The district court granted the players’ motion for a preliminary injunction. The NFL appealed, claiming the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 29 U.S.C. § 101 (NLGA), prohibited the injunction, restricting the ability of courts to grant injunctions in labor disputes.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Colloton, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Bye, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.