Bramlett v. Selman

597 S.W.2d 80 (1980)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bramlett v. Selman

Arkansas Supreme Court
597 S.W.2d 80 (1980)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

James Bramlett (defendant) and Benjamin Selman (plaintiff) began a homosexual relationship in 1977. Selman was married at the time, but he eventually left his family and moved in with Bramlett. Selman divorced his wife shortly thereafter, and he opened a bank account in Bramlett’s name, depositing $7,000. Bramlett claimed that the money was a gift, but Selman maintained that they had a mutual understanding whereby Bramlett would use the money to purchase a house for his and Bramlett’s benefit. According to Selman, Bramlett was supposed to convey title to the property after Selman’s divorce was finalized. Selman eventually felt guilty and informed his wife of the property during the divorce proceedings. Near the end of 1977, Bramlett and Selman had a falling out. Bramlett refused to convey the title to Selman. Selman moved out and brought an action seeking to compel Bramlett to convey the title to him. A chancellor found that Bramlett held title as a constructive trustee for Selman and ordered Bramlett to convey the title. Bramlett appealed, contending that the trial court erred by finding the existence of a constructive trust.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stroud, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership