Brandeis Intsel Ltd. v. Calabrian Chemicals Corp.

656 F. Supp. 160 (1987)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brandeis Intsel Ltd. v. Calabrian Chemicals Corp.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
656 F. Supp. 160 (1987)

Facts

Brandeis Intsel Limited (Brandeis) (plaintiff), an English company, entered into an agreement with Calabrian Chemicals Corp. (Calabrian), a New York corporation, for the purchase of cuprous chloride. The contract contained an arbitration clause requiring arbitration before the London Metal Exchange. Calabrian shipped the chemical by boat, and upon the boat’s arrival at port, it was discovered that part of the shipment was damaged. Brandeis rejected the shipment in its entirety and requested a replacement. Calabrian refused the rejection and replacement. Brandeis commenced arbitration proceedings against Calabrian in England. The arbitral panel issued an award in favor of Brandeis. Brandeis filed an action in United States district court to enforce the award, and Calabrian filed a cross-motion to vacate the award on the grounds that the arbitration panel acted in manifest disregard for the law, citing the United States Supreme Court holding in Wilko v. Swan, and arguing that this defense came within the purview of the public-policy exception to avoid enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention). Calabrian contended that the English arbitrators incorrectly applied sales law to Brandeis’s claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Haight, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership