Brandeis Intsel Ltd. v. Calabrian Chemicals Corp.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
656 F. Supp. 160 (1987)
- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
Brandeis Intsel Limited (Brandeis) (plaintiff), an English company, entered into an agreement with Calabrian Chemicals Corp. (Calabrian), a New York corporation, for the purchase of cuprous chloride. The contract contained an arbitration clause requiring arbitration before the London Metal Exchange. Calabrian shipped the chemical by boat, and upon the boat’s arrival at port, it was discovered that part of the shipment was damaged. Brandeis rejected the shipment in its entirety and requested a replacement. Calabrian refused the rejection and replacement. Brandeis commenced arbitration proceedings against Calabrian in England. The arbitral panel issued an award in favor of Brandeis. Brandeis filed an action in United States district court to enforce the award, and Calabrian filed a cross-motion to vacate the award on the grounds that the arbitration panel acted in manifest disregard for the law, citing the United States Supreme Court holding in Wilko v. Swan, and arguing that this defense came within the purview of the public-policy exception to avoid enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention). Calabrian contended that the English arbitrators incorrectly applied sales law to Brandeis’s claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Haight, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.