Brandon v. Chicago Board of Education
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
143 F.3d 293 (1998)
- Written by Shelby Crawford, JD
Facts
Brandon (plaintiff) filed an Americans with Disabilities action against the Chicago Board of Education (defendant). The clerk of court made an error entering the name of Brandon’s attorney when docketing the case and mail from the court regarding Brandon’s case was sent to the wrong attorney. After Brandon’s attorney did not receive notice of and did not appear at two hearings, the court dismissed Brandon’s case. The court order dismissing Brandon’s case was also sent to the wrong attorney. After discovering what happened, Brandon’s attorney filed a motion to vacate the judgment dismissing Brandon’s case pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). The district court denied Brandon’s motion for relief from the judgment entered against him. Brandon appealed the district court’s denial of his motion for relief under Rule 60(b), arguing that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for relief. The Court of Appeals held that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Brandon’s motion for relief because Brandon did not bring the motion within the required time period.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rovner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.