Brandon v. County of Richardson

624 N.W.2d 604 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brandon v. County of Richardson

Nebraska Supreme Court
624 N.W.2d 604 (2001)

Play video

Facts

JoAnn Brandon (plaintiff) filed suit against the County of Richardson (defendant) and Sheriff Charles Laux (defendant) for negligence, wrongful death, and intentional infliction of emotional distress arising out of events leading up to, and including, the murder of her daughter, Teena. Teena identified as a male and began dating a woman in a nearby town. Subsequently, John Lotter and Thomas Nissen violently beat and raped Teena. Teena reported the sexual assault to Sheriff Laux and was questioned about the incident in a confrontational and extremely graphic manner by Laux. The questioning was captured on a tape recording. At the time Teena reported the rape, Laux was aware that Lotter and Nissen had criminal pasts and had made specific threats on Teena's life following the rape. Subsequently, Teena and two others were found murdered in Richardson County, and Lotter and Nissen were tried for the murders. During the trial, several law-enforcement officers testified that Laux's conduct during the interview was inappropriate, and one officer called Laux's conduct "very unprofessional" and "outrageous." Lotter and Nissen were convicted of the murders. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found the County negligent and awarded economic damages in the amount of $6,223.20 and non-economic damages of $80,000. However, the trial court reduced the award on the negligence claim by 85 percent for the intentional torts of Lotter and Nissen and by 1 percent for Teena's own negligence and denied recovery for intentional infliction of emotional distress. JoAnn Brandon appealed, and the County cross-appealed. On appeal, JoAnn Brandon claimed, among other things, that the trial court erred in denying recovery for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hendry, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership