From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Brannon v. Gulf States Energy Corp.
Supreme Court of Texas
562 S.W.2d 219 (1977)
In 1973, Clara Martin executed an oil and gas lease to Mary Elliot. The lease provided that it would terminate on November 20, 1974, unless construction of a well began before that date or Elliot paid a delay rental on or before that date annually. Gulf States Energy Corporation (Gulf) (defendant) purchased the Martin lease, as well as an adjoining lease (the Evans lease) from Elliot. Gulf then executed an agreement with Master Drillers, Inc. (Master Drillers). In October 1974, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) seized both leases to enforce a tax lien against Master Drillers. The first delay rental on the Martin lease was not paid by November 20, 1974. On January 17, 1975, Gulf wrote Martin a letter entitled “Lease Rental” and enclosed a check in the amount of the delay rental, which was also designated as a lease rental. Martin received, accepted, and cashed the check. On May 27, 1975, Otis Thompson and M.J. Brannon (plaintiffs) purchased at an IRS at auction all Master Drillers’s rights in the two leases. On July 9, 1975, Martin executed a new oil and gas lease on the same tract of land to Gulf. The plaintiffs sued for a declaratory judgment that the 1973 lease was still in effect and that the new 1975 lease was void. Gulf argued that the 1975 lease was valid, claiming that the check it has submitted in January 1975 was not a rental payment, but an advance bonus payment for the 1975 lease. Martin testified to the same, as she had reached an oral agreement to that effect with Gulf after she had received the January 1975 check. Over the objection of the plaintiffs, the trial court permitted this testimony. The trial court ruled in favor of Gulf. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Daniel, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.