Bratton v. Bratton
Tennessee Supreme Court
136 S.W.3d 595 (2004)
Cynthia Lee Bratton (plaintiff) and Michael Wayne Bratton (defendant) married in June 1982. When the couple married, Michael had completed his first year of medical school, and Cynthia was a research technician. Cynthia had a child from a previous marriage, and the couple later had two more children. In August 1983, the couple entered a postnuptial agreement, which outlined the division of property if the couple divorced. The postnuptial agreement provided that if Michael was guilty of statutory grounds for divorce and Cynthia initiated the divorce, the parties would divide the property equally. The postnuptial agreement also required Michael to pay Cynthia half his net income if Cynthia began a divorce and Michael was guilty of the statutory grounds for divorce. At trial, Cynthia testified that Michael proposed a postnuptial agreement to formalize an agreement before the marriage, stating Michael would provide one-half of his income if the couple divorced. Michael testified that Cynthia demanded a legally binding agreement to protect her if Michael left her. In March 2000, Cynthia filed for divorce, and Michael subsequently filed a motion for partial summary judgement to have the postnuptial agreement invalid for lack of consideration. The trial court granted Cynthia a divorce based on Michael’s adultery and divided the marital property by the terms of the postnuptial agreement. On appeal, the court of appeals found the postnuptial agreement was a violation of public policy. Cynthia and Michael both appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Barker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.