Breimhorst v. Educational Testing Services
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
2000 WL 34510621 (2000)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
A group of disabled individuals (plaintiffs) received accommodations from Educational Testing Services (ETS) (defendant) in the administration of certain higher-education admissions tests. ETS administers the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), the Graduate Records Exam (GRE), and the Graduate Management Admissions Test (GMAT), among others. ETS has a practice of flagging tests given with accommodations by placing the phrase “SCORES OBTAINED UNDER SPECIAL CONDITIONS” prominently on the test-score report. ETS has stated that this flag is placed on the score report to note that the scores may not accurately reflect the test taker’s educational ability when given under accommodations. The plaintiffs requested that ETS remove this flag, because the flag alerts potential colleges that the plaintiffs are disabled. The plaintiffs asserted that their test scores were equivalent to non-disabled students’ scores. ETS denied these requests. The plaintiffs then sued ETS, alleging that the flag violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). ETS filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Orrick, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.