Brekke v. Wills

125 Cal. App. 4th 1400, 23 Cal. Rptr. 3d 609 (2005)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brekke v. Wills

California Court of Appeal
125 Cal. App. 4th 1400, 23 Cal. Rptr. 3d 609 (2005)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Dean Wills (defendant) met Danielle at school when both were teenagers. After the two began a dating relationship, Danielle’s grades declined, she had behavioral issues, and she skipped school. Danielle’s mother, Beverly Brekke (plaintiff) restricted Danielle’s ability to see Wills. Concerned that Danielle was using drugs, Brekke searched Danielle’s room. There, Brekke found disturbing letters from Wills that instructed Danielle on how to retaliate against Brekke. Brekke told Danielle that she could no longer see Wills. Wills then wrote three “vile and vitriolic” letters to Danielle with the expectation that Brekke would find and read them. The letters related a plan to provoke Danielle’s father into attacking Wills so that Wills could sue the parents for money and another plan in which Danielle and Wills would murder Brekke and her husband so that there was “no trace” of the parents. One letter, which included a greeting to Brekke, used grossly obscene language (“fuck you in the ass” or “rape yourself you psychotic fucking whore”) and insinuated that Wills had been sexually intimate with Danielle. Brekke did not necessarily believe Wills’s threats of murder but believed that Wills was mentally imbalanced and irrational and thus unpredictable in his behavior. Brekke felt harassed and annoyed by Wills’s conduct. Wills’s father did not think Wills could physically hurt anybody but acknowledged that Wills had had a hard time controlling his emotions. Brekke sued Wills to obtain a temporary restraining order and injunction. Following a hearing, the trial court issued a no-contact order requiring Wills to stay at least 20 feet away from Danielle at school and at least 100 yards away from her otherwise. Wills appealed, arguing that the order violated his First Amendment rights and should have an expiration date.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scotland, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership