Brennan’s, Inc. v. Brennan’s Restaurant, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
360 F.3d 125 (2004)
- Written by Mike Cicero , JD
Facts
Brennan’s, Inc. (Brennan’s New Orleans) (plaintiff) operated a restaurant named Brennan’s, founded in New Orleans in 1946, and a restaurant named Owen Brennan’s Restaurant in Memphis, Tennessee. Brennan’s New Orleans obtained a federal registration for its “Brennan’s” mark, and that registration became incontestable. However, Brennan’s New Orleans did not operate any restaurants in the New York City area. Terrance Brennan was a well-known chef in Manhattan, where he operated two restaurants: Picholine and Artisanal. He then opened a restaurant under the name Brennan’s Seafood & Chop House. A corporation called 565 Lexington Avenue Co., LLC was formed to own and operate the restaurant, the sole managing member of which was Brennan’s Restaurant, LLC (collectively, Brennan’s Manhattan) (defendant). After receiving a cease-and-desist letter from Brennan’s New Orleans, Brennan’s Manhattan renamed this latest restaurant Terrance Brennan’s Seafood & Chop House. Nevertheless, Brennan’s New Orleans brought several trademark-related claims against Brennan’s Manhattan, including for infringement of a registered trademark under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 and for false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). Brennan’s New Orleans moved for a preliminary injunction. Following a hearing, the district court denied that motion. Brennan’s New Orleans appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cardamone, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.