Brennan v. Arnheim & Neely, Inc.

410 U.S. 512, 93 S. Ct. 1138, 35 L. Ed. 2d 463 (1973)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brennan v. Arnheim & Neely, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
410 U.S. 512, 93 S. Ct. 1138, 35 L. Ed. 2d 463 (1973)

Facts

Arnheim & Neely, Inc. (Arnheim) (defendant) managed eight office buildings and an apartment complex in Pittsburgh. Under Arnheim’s contracts with the buildings’ various owners, Arnheim was responsible for obtaining tenants, negotiating leases, collecting rents, and generally managing and maintaining the properties. As part of those general management services, Arnheim handled the hiring, firing, supervision, and payroll for supervisory, maintenance, and janitorial staffs at the properties. Arnheim scheduled the workers, set compensation and fringe benefits, and engaged in collective bargaining with unionized employees, all subject to approval from the property owners. Arnheim maintained a separate bank account for each property but managed all the operations from a single office. Peter Brennan, United States secretary of labor (secretary) (plaintiff), brought an action against Arnheim alleging violations of the minimum-wage, overtime, and recordkeeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) with respect to maintenance, custodial, and operational workers at the properties. The district court found, among other things, that Arnheim’s aggregate activities at all nine locations were an enterprise for purposes of the FLSA. The appellate court reversed, finding that the building owners were unrelated and had no common business purpose. The United States Supreme Court granted the secretary’s petition for certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership