Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Brennan v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
501 F.2d 1196 (7th Cir. 1974)


Facts

Republic Creosoting Company (Republic) (defendant) was in the business of acquiring and preparing railroad ties for use by railroad companies. Each tie weighed about 150 to 235 pounds. Republic received deliveries of the ties by truck. The ties were always bound together into packages by a single steel band. Republic established a specific process for unloading the ties. Republic’s unloader operator would first move a forklift into place to support one package of ties. Once the forklift was in place, the truck driver would cut the band, at which point the unloader operator would remove the package from the truck. All other employees were required to remain a safe distance away from the truck during the unloading process. On July 9, 1971, Raymond Davis, a new employee, was present during the unloading of a truck. Davis had not received training on the unloading process. Wallace Worley, the field superintendent, instructed Davis not to be near the truck during unloading and advised Davis that the unloader operator would do all of the unloading. However, before the unloader operator had placed the forklift in position, Davis spontaneously approached the truck and cut the steel band. Five ties fell onto Davis, causing his death. U.S. Secretary of Labor Peter Brennan (Secretary) (plaintiff) issued a citation against Republic, alleging that Davis’s accident constituted a serious violation of the general-duty clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-78. The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) (defendant) vacated the citation. The Secretary appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Pell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.