Brent v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
27 Mich. App. 628, 183 N.W.2d 908 (1970)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
The City of Detroit (defendant) proposed to build an outdoor swimming pool in Palmer Park, which was near various apartments and properties owned by several parties (collectively, property owners) (plaintiffs). The city council held a public meeting on the site of the pool, and in response to the property owners’ complaints about noise, traffic, and parking issues that would arise from the pool’s operation, the city council selected a new location for the pool over 400 feet away from the nearest apartment. The property owners nevertheless sued the city, praying for an injunction to stop the pool construction at the new location because it would constitute a nuisance. The trial court granted summary judgment for the city. The property owners appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gillis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.