Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association
United States Supreme Court
531 U.S. 288, 121 S. Ct. 924, 148 L. Ed. 2d 807 (2001)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association (the association) (plaintiff) was a nonprofit private-membership corporation organized to regulate interscholastic sports among public and private high schools in Tennessee that were members of the association. Although schools were not forced to join, almost all of the state’s public schools, and many of its private schools, were members because there was no other interscholastic sports regulatory authority in the state. The Tennessee State Board of Education even recognized the association as the primary regulatory agency in the state for high-school sports, and the association’s voting membership was almost exclusively composed of public-high-school administrators. In 1997, the association brought a regulatory-enforcement proceeding against Brentwood Academy (defendant), a private member school. Brentwood was charged with improperly recruiting new students for its sports teams and was given a large fine and suspension by the association. After sustaining these penalties, Brentwood Academy sued the association in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that enforcement of the recruitment rule against it was a state action and a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The district court entered summary judgment for Brentwood Academy, but the court of appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
Dissent (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.