Bretford Manufacturing, Inc. v. Smith System Manufacturing Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
419 F.3d 576 (2005)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Bretford Manufacturing, Inc. (plaintiff) manufactured computer tables that had one leg on each side. Each leg was attached to the tabletop with a V-shaped brace. From 1990 to 1997, Bretford was the only manufacturer of this type of table. Smith System Manufacturing Corporation (defendant) was a competitor of Bretford and decided to incorporate a similar brace into its tables. Smith met with the Dallas school system to discuss a bulk purchase of its tables. However, Dallas asked for a sample of the table, and Smith’s prototype was not ready. As a result, Smith made a sample using a tabletop manufactured by Smith and a leg assembly manufactured by Bretford. Bretford sued Smith for violating the Lanham Act. Bretford asserted that the V-shaped brace constituted Bretford’s trade dress and that Smith was guilty of “reverse passing off.” The district court ruled in favor of Smith. Bretford appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.