Breuer v. Jim's Concrete of Brevard, Inc.

538 U.S. 691, 123 S. Ct. 1882, 155 L. Ed. 2d 923 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Breuer v. Jim’s Concrete of Brevard, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
538 U.S. 691, 123 S. Ct. 1882, 155 L. Ed. 2d 923 (2003)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Phillip T. Breuer (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against his former employer, Jim’s Concrete of Brevard, Inc. (Jim’s Concrete) (defendant) in state court under the Fair Labor Standards Act (the act) for unpaid wages. Section 216(b) of the act provided that a lawsuit brought under the act could be maintained against an employer in any federal or state court with jurisdiction over the parties. Jim’s Concrete removed the case to federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), which allowed a defendant to remove a case filed in state court to federal court if the federal court had original jurisdiction over the case. Breuer moved to remand the case, arguing that the language of § 216(b), allowing a plaintiff to maintain a case in state or federal court, prohibited Jim’s Concrete from removing the case. Breuer highlighted the use of the term maintain to argue that Congress intended a case filed in one court to stay in that court until final judgment was rendered. The district court denied Breuer’s motion. The court of appeals affirmed the district court, holding that because § 216(b) did not expressly prohibit removal, the removal of Breuer’s case was proper. The court of appeals supported its holding by demonstrating that Congress had prohibited removal under other federal statutes by including language explicitly forbidding removal. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership