Brewer v. Insight Technology, Inc.

689 S.E.2d 330 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brewer v. Insight Technology, Inc.

Georgia Court of Appeals
689 S.E.2d 330 (2009)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Darren Brewer (defendant) worked simultaneously for two companies in direct competition with each other. Brewer was president of Insight Technology, Inc. (ITI) (defendant), an internet-based business founded by Gary Aliengena that matched truckers with freight-hauling jobs. ITI expanded its business to include freight factoring, which involved financing small, independent truckers seeking temporary or one-off jobs. Eventually most of ITI’s business came from factoring, and ITI created a division called FactorLoads to fill a niche in the factoring market. Two years later, Brewer met Pat Hull, who owned competing load-board business GetLoaded.com LLC (GetLoaded). When Hull expressed interest in the factoring business, Brewer tried to persuade Hull to let ITI advertise on getloaded.com, but Hull refused. Instead, Hull incorporated FreightCheck, an internet-based factoring business that competed directly with FactorLoads. Hull and Brewer co-owned FreightCheck equally and shared responsibilities for managing and operating the company. Brewer operated FreightCheck out of the same building as ITI, used the same software, and told ITI employees to do clandestine work for FreightCheck. Within a year, FactorLoads’ revenues decreased, and Brewer convinced Aliengena to sell ITI to GetLoaded. Before the sale closed, an ITI employee told Aliengena that Brewer co-owned and managed FreightCheck. Aliengena fired Brewer and sued. Hull, GetLoaded, and FreightCheck all settled such that only Brewer went to trial. Aliengena testified ITI would have profited in a merger with GetLoaded. The jury found Brewer liable to ITI for over $1 million for breach of fiduciary duty and misappropriation of corporate opportunity. Brewer appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Phipps, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership