Brickell Partners v. Wise
Delaware Court of Chancery
794 A.2d 1 (2001)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Brickell Partners (Brickell) (plaintiff), a limited partner in El Paso Energy Partners, L.P. (El Paso), filed a derivative suit on behalf of El Paso challenging El Paso’s acquisition of Crystal Gas Storage, Inc. (Crystal) from El Paso Energy Corporation (Energy). Energy also owned and controlled El Paso’s general partner, DeepTech International, Inc. (DeepTech), and held a minority interest in El Paso. El Paso purchased Crystal for $170 million in newly issued El Paso preference units. According to Brickell, that price exceeded Crystal’s value. As provided in the El Paso partnership agreement (the agreement), the transaction was subject to a special approval process by DeepTech’s Conflicts and Audit Committee (the committee), whose members were Michael Bracy, a director of DeepTech and former employee of Energy, and H. Douglas Church, also a DeepTech director. The committee approved the transaction. El Paso’s complaint alleged that the transaction was invalid due to the conflict of interest created by Energy’s ownership and control of DeepTech and due to the fact that the committee was made up solely of DeepTech directors, effectively giving Energy control over El Paso’s approval of the transaction. DeepTech and its directors filed a motion to dismiss the complaint.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Strine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.