Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.

553 U.S. 639 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.

United States Supreme Court
553 U.S. 639 (2008)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Company (Phoenix) (plaintiff) and Sabre Group, LLC (defendant) were participants in Cook County sales of tax liens. The bidding system often resulted in ties between bidders, so a rotation was used to award properties to bidders who tied. Each bidding entity was prohibited from using agents or other representatives to submit multiple, simultaneous bids for the same lien by the single, simultaneous bidder rule. Phoenix filed a complaint in district court alleging that Sabre Group had violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) by fraudulently obtaining liens in violation of the single, simultaneous bidder rule. Phoenix also alleged that Sabre Group had committed mail fraud in furtherance of its scheme. The district court dismissed Phoenix’s claim for lack of standing because Phoenix was not a direct victim of Sabre Group’s alleged fraud. Phoenix appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The appellate court reversed. Sabre Group appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership