Bridgeman Art Library, Ltd. v. Corel Corp.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
36 F.Supp.2d 191 (1999)
- Written by Cynthia (Anderson) Beeler, JD
Facts
Bridgeman Art Library, Limited (Bridgeman) (plaintiff) claimed ownership of the copyrights in color transparencies and digital versions of certain paintings in the United Kingdom. The underlying paintings were in the public domain in the United States. Corel Corporation (Corel) (defendant) sold CD-ROMs that contained digital images of paintings. Bridgeman sued Corel Corporation for copyright infringement in the United States, claiming that some of the images contained on Corel’s CD-ROMs infringed Bridgman’s copyrights in the transparencies and digital images. The district court granted Corel’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the transparencies and digital copies did not meet the originality requirement under United States law and thus could not receive copyright protection. Bridgeman filed a motion for reconsideration, arguing that the United States must honor copyrights from the United Kingdom under the terms of the Berne Convention and the Universal Copyright Convention.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kaplan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.