Bright v. Ball Memorial Hospital Association
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
616 F.2d 328 (1980)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Bright (plaintiff) received treatment at Ball Memorial Hospital Association (defendant). When Bright did not pay her bill, Ball informed her that she was in default and attempted to get payment. Under Ball’s standard procedure, any unpaid account over 48 days old was in default. After several rounds of notices, Ball would send a delinquent account to a collection agency. Ball sent Bright several letters requesting payment and informing Bright of the default. Ball also charged interest on the overdue bill and a late-payment charge. Bright never paid her bill. Bright sued, arguing that the charged interest and late-payment charge made Ball a creditor, and Ball failed to give her the disclosures creditors were required to give under the Truth in Lending Act. The court found that Ball was not a creditor within the meaning of the act. Bright appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Will, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.