Bright v. Ganas
Court of Appeals of Maryland
189 A. 427 (1937)
Paul Ganas (plaintiff) worked as a servant for James G. Darden beginning in 1929. Darden drafted an agreement stating that Darden would pay Ganas $20,000 from Darden’s estate if Ganas served Darden faithfully for the rest of Darden’s life. In 1933, Ganas wrote Darden’s wife a letter professing Ganas’ love. Darden’s wife never showed Darden the letter. Darden subsequently died. Ganas sued Robert S. Bright (defendant), the executor of Darden’s estate, for the $20,000. Bright refused payment after learning of the letter Ganas wrote Darden’s wife. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Ganas awarding him $8,990. Bright appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sloan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,400 briefs, keyed to 183 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.