From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Brill v. Davajon
Illinois Appellate Court
51 Ill.App.2d 445, 201 N.E.2d 253 (1964)
Frank McFarland was a cab driver who worked for the Checker Taxi Company (Checker) (defendant). One night, while working, McFarland came across a stalled car driven by Joel Davajon. McFarland offered to push Davajon’s car with his Checker-owned cab. While McFarland was pushing Davajon’s car, the vehicles collided with a car driven by David M. Brill (plaintiff). Brill filed a lawsuit related to his injuries, seeking damages from Davajon as the driver of the stalled car and Checker through the doctrine of respondeat superior. Checker filed a motion for a directed verdict holding that it was not liable for McFarland’s actions under the doctrine of respondeat superior. To support its motion, Checker argued that McFarland was not acting in the normal course of his employment when he pushed Davajon’s car with his cab. Checker presented evidence showing McFarland’s actions violated a company policy that forbade employees from using cabs to push other cars. The trial court denied Checker’s motion. Checker appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Dempsey, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.