Brilliance Audio, Inc. v. Haights Cross Communications, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
474 F.3d 365 (2007)
- Written by Emily Houde, JD
Facts
Brilliance Audio, Inc. (Brilliance) (plaintiff) produced and sold audiobooks via exclusive agreements with publishers and authors. Brilliance copyrighted these audiobooks and registered “Brilliance” as a trademark. As part of its business, Brilliance produced two versions of each audiobook. One version was used for retail, and the other was used for libraries and lending institutions. Haights Cross Communications, Inc. (Haights) (defendant) was a competitor of Brilliance in the audiobook industry. Brilliance alleged that Haights was distributing for a profit Brilliance’s retail audiobooks labeled as library audiobooks. Furthermore, Brilliance claimed that Haights used Brilliance’s trademark on these repackaged audiobooks. Brilliance sued Haights for copyright infringement, trademark infringement, unfair competition under federal law, dilution, and common-law trademark infringement and unfair competition. Haights filed a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for Brilliance’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and the district court granted it. The district court found that the defense of first sale applied to this case. Brilliance appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gibbons, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.