British Airways PLC v. Commission

Case T-219/99, 2003 E.C.R. II-5917 (2003)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
B
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

British Airways PLC v. Commission

European Union Court of First Instance
Case T-219/99, 2003 E.C.R. II-5917 (2003)

KL

Facts

Travel agents competed with each other to sell seats on flights operated by British Airways PLC (BA) (defendant) at reasonable costs to passengers. If travel agents selling tickets for BA flights hit their individual sales-growth targets, BA paid them an increased rate of commission. BA paid the increased rate on tickets sold after the agent hit his or her target and also for all other tickets the agent sold during a specified time period. As a result, different agents selling the same amount of revenue received different commission rates based on their individual sales figures and target-growth rates. In addition, each travel agent’s ability to compete depended in part on his or her financial resources. The European Commission (commission) (plaintiff) commenced an investigation into BA’s commission practices, ultimately finding that BA’s performance rewards constituted an abuse of its dominant market position in the United Kingdom air-travel market by producing discriminatory effects on travel agents in paying them different rates for identical services. BA appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Antitrust

Key Terms