British Columbia v. Canadian Forest Products Ltd.
Canada Supreme Court
2 S.C.R. 74 (2004)
- Written by Sheryl McGrath, JD
Facts
Following a 1992 fire that burned a federal forest reserve, the Province of British Columbia (province) (plaintiff) sued Canadian Forest Products Ltd. (Canfor) (defendant), alleging that Canfor’s negligence caused the fire. The trial court found the parties equally responsible for the destruction that resulted from the fire in that Canfor’s negligence caused the fire and the province’s negligent firefighting allowed the fire to continue to burn. An intermediate appellate court agreed that both parties were responsible but found Canfor 70 percent liable for the destruction. The province and Canfor appealed to the Canada Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.