Brizendine v. Conrad
Supreme Court of Missouri
71 S.W.3d 587 (2002)
David Brizendine (plaintiff) leased a low-income apartment building to Nora Conrad (defendant) for a term of 12 months. The parties intended Conrad to purchase the building at the end of the lease period. The lease required Conrad to pay Brizendine $15,000 at the execution of the lease, which would be credited toward Conrad’s purchase of the building at the end of the lease. The lease required Conrad to assume several maintenance duties for the property, to maintain it in good condition, and to return the property “in the same condition as received, ordinary wear and tear excepted” if Conrad did not purchase it at the end of the lease. Further, the lease stated that Conrad’s $15,000 payment would be retained as liquidated damages if Conrad failed to fulfill her lease obligations. At the end of the lease term, Conrad notified Brizendine that she would not purchase the property. Brizendine informed Conrad that the property was not in acceptable condition because it had extensive damage beyond normal wear and tear. Brizendine estimated that the cost to repair the damage done was $30,355. Rather than invest that sum of money to make the repairs, Brizendine took an offer from a new buyer and then sued Conrad under a statutory theory of waste. Conrad argued that she was not liable for waste because the lease’s liquidated-damages clause constituted a special license to commit waste under a state statute. The trial court found for Brizendine and awarded waste damages in the amount of approximately $11,000, based on the cost of repair. Pursuant to the waste statute’s provisions, the court then trebled the amount to approximately $33,000. Conrad appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.