Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.

481 U.S. 252 (1987)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
B
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
481 U.S. 252 (1987)

SC

Facts

Roadway Express, Inc. (Roadway Express) (plaintiff) fired Hufstetler for alleged misconduct. Hufstetler filed a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (defendant). Hufstetler claimed that he had been fired in retaliation for his reporting of safety violations. In accordance with the whistleblower provision in the Surface Transportation Act of 1982, OSHA investigated the complaint and ordered Hufstetler’s temporary reinstatement. During the investigation, Roadway Express was permitted to present evidence to OSHA but could not respond to evidence Hufstetler presented. Specifically, OSHA declined to present Roadway Express with a list of the witnesses to be used against Roadway Express. OSHA held a full hearing 19 months after ordering Hufstetler’s reinstatement. Roadway Express brought suit claiming that OSHA’s temporary reinstatement order violated its procedural due process rights. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (White, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Stevens, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Brennan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Administrative Law

Key Terms