Brook v. St. John’s Hickey Memorial Hospital
Supreme Court of Indiana
269 Ind. 270, 380 N.E.2d 72 (1978)
At approximately two years of age, Terry Lynn Brook (plaintiff) was diagnosed as having a possible urological disorder that would need to be confirmed by injecting her with a contrast medium and then taking x-rays. Dr. Fischer (defendant), a radiologist, injected the contrast medium into the calves of Terry’s legs despite the instruction on the package label that it should be injected into the buttocks. About four months later, Terry’s right leg became stiff and her heel began to lift off of the ground. It was later determined that a shortening of her Achilles tendon was the cause of her leg problem which was subsequently corrected via two surgical operations. Tracy’s father, Arthur, brought suit against Fischer, St. John’s Hickey Memorial Hospital, and two other physicians, alleging that Fischer went beyond common medical practice by negligently choosing an improper site on Terry’s body to inject the contrast medium and that his decision amounted to a medical experiment. At trial, the court refused to give the Brooks’ jury “instruction number 4” which stated that any new medical procedure should pass through an experimental stage and that “a radiologist is not authorized in trying untested experiments on patients”. Brook appealed. The court of appeals found that Fischer’s choice of injection site may have been a medical experiment since other physicians did not use the calf muscles as injection sites for the contrast medium.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hunter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.