Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • B
  • Brooks v. Chicago Downs Association, Inc.Brooks v. Chicago Downs Association, Inc.
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Brooks v. Chicago Downs Association, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
791 F.2d 512 (1986)


Eric Brooks, Jeffrey Yass, and Kenneth Brodie (plaintiffs) formed a partnership to pool assets and place bets at horseracing tracks. The plaintiffs have described themselves as expert handicappers. Chicago Downs Association, Inc. (defendant) operates Sportsman’s Park, which conducts horseracing events. Sportsman’s offers a special type of bet called the Super Bet. To win the Super Bet, a person has to correctly choose the first two finishers of the fifth and sixth races and the first three finishers of the seventh race. If no one wins the Super Bet, the total amount wagered on it is rolled over and added to the potential winnings for the next racing date. On one occasion, the plaintiffs won the Super Bet, winning $600,000 on a $60,000 wager. The plaintiffs returned to Sportsman’s on another date and attempted to place a $250,000 wager in the Super Bet. At that point, the Chicago Downs Association ordered the plaintiffs to leave and informed the plaintiffs that they had been barred from attending all future racing events at Sportsman’s. The plaintiffs sued the Chicago Downs Association and sought an injunction prohibiting the Chicago Downs Association from barring them from entering Sportsman’s. The Chicago Downs Association filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that it has the absolute right to exclude anyone from its premises for any reason except for race, creed, color, national origin, or sex. The trial court granted the motion, and the plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Flaum, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial