From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Brophy v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Co.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
947 F. Supp. 879 (1996)
Donald and Joan Brophy (plaintiffs) applied for a residential mortgage from Chase Manhattan Mortgage Co. (Chase) (defendant). During the application process, the Brophys were given loan disclosures required by the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z, including estimates of several fees related to the mortgage. When the Brophys settled their mortgage, the fees were higher than the estimated amounts. The Brophys filed a lawsuit in federal court against Chase, alleging that Chase violated the Truth in Lending Act and § 2604 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act by failing to provide a good-faith estimate of the fees. The Brophys argued that the discrepancies between the estimated fees and the final settlement fees indicated that Chase made its estimates in bad faith. Chase moved for summary judgment, arguing that it made good-faith estimates of mortgage fees as required by the Truth in Lending Act and that the Brophys did not have a cause of action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act because § 2604, unlike other sections of that act, did not explicitly provide a private right of action for plaintiffs.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brody, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 619,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.