Broussard v. Continental Oil Co.

433 So. 2d 354 (1983)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Broussard v. Continental Oil Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal
433 So. 2d 354 (1983)

Facts

Mildredge T. Broussard (plaintiff), a carpenter’s helper, was employed by Crain Brothers Construction Company. Broussard and Sanders Miller, a carpenter, were building a sump-box enclosure at the end of a natural-gas vent line at a Continental Oil Co. (Conoco) (defendant) plant. At the jobsite, both Broussard and Miller could hear and smell natural gas escaping from the vent line. Miller twice notified a Conoco foreman and requested the gas be turned off, but the request was refused on the ground that the entire plant would have to be shut down. Sparks from a drill Broussard was using ignited the natural-gas fumes emitted from the vent line and caused an explosion, badly burning him. Broussard brought a personal-injury action against Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. (defendant) and the Home Insurance Company (defendant). Evidence showed that sparks were normally emitted from such drills and this was not a design defect. Broussard and Miller both testified that they were unaware that sparks from a drill could ignite atmospheric gases. Conoco’s foreman, Allen Nunez, also testified that no one at Conoco was aware of the possibility. A warning about the exact situation appeared in the Black & Decker owner’s manual (Item 18), which was placed in every drill box as it left the manufacturer’s control. Item 18 provided: “DO NOT OPERATE portable electric tools in gaseous or explosive atmospheres. Motors in these tools normally spark, and the sparks might ignite fumes.” Broussard maintained that the warning should have been placed on the drill itself. The warning on the drill read, “CAUTION: For Safe Operation See Owner’s Manual.” Broussard’s witness suggested using symbols for warnings on the drill. The jury found that Black & Decker was not at fault for failure to adequately warn, and Broussard appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stoker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership