Brown Machine, Inc. v. Hercules, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
770 S.W.2d 416 (1989)
- Written by Sarah Larkin, JD
Facts
Hercules, Inc. (Hercules) (defendant) requested a price quote from Brown Machine, Inc. (Brown) (plaintiff) for a piece of equipment. Brown sent the quote, which included a cover page stating that Brown wished to further discuss the quote and that the quote was being submitted for “approval.” Also attached to the quote were several paragraphs, including one providing that the quotation was not an offer that could be accepted. In response to the proposal, Hercules submitted a purchase order. The purchase order provided that acceptance of the order expressly limited the terms of the contract to the terms of the purchase order. The purchase order did not contain an indemnity provision. In response to the purchase order, Brown sent Hercules an order acknowledgment, which contained an indemnity provision. The equipment was shipped to Hercules and the agreed-upon purchase price was paid. Sometime later, an employee of Hercules was injured by the equipment and sued Brown. Brown insisted that Hercules honor the indemnity provision, but Hercules refused. Brown filed suit against Hercules seeking the settlement amount it had paid to the injured employee. The trial court found in favor of Brown for indemnification and awarded damages. Hercules appealed to the Missouri Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stephan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.