Brown v. Li
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
308 F.3d 939 (2002)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
Christopher Brown (plaintiff) was a graduate student at the University of California at Santa Barbara (UCSB) (defendant), a state-funded university. Brown was required to write a thesis subject to approval by Brown’s thesis committee to earn a master’s degree. The thesis was subject to the requirements detailed in the UCSB’s Graduate Student’s Handbook, allowing students to include an optional “Acknowledgments” section at the end of the thesis. According to the handbook, the thesis aimed to educate students on properly presenting research results. In the spring of 1999, Brown submitted his thesis for approval without an acknowledgments section. The thesis committee approved Brown’s thesis. After receiving approval, Brown added a two-page “Disacknowledgments” section, which included a profanity-laced section that named several state and university officials that Brown believed hindered his graduate studies. Brown attempted to file his thesis with the Disacknowledgments section in the university library, as was required to graduate. The Dean of the Graduate School, Charles Li (defendant), was alerted to the addition of the Disacknowledgments section and referred the thesis back to the thesis committee. The thesis committee refused to approve Brown’s thesis containing the Disacknowledgments section. Brown appealed this decision through various university channels with no luck. In May of 2000, UCSB finally agreed to provide Brown with a degree based on the original approved version of his thesis. Brown filed a lawsuit alleging that his First Amendment rights had been violated. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Brown appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Graber, J.)
Concurrence (Ferguson, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Reinhardt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.