Supreme Court of Illinois
389 N.E.2d 1188 (1979)
In 1947, the Bosts received a one-third interest in the mineral rights to 80 acres of land, with the owner reserving two-thirds of the interest. In 1957, the Bosts conveyed their interest to the Browns (plaintiffs) through general warranty deed with no exceptions. In 1974, the Browns tried to sell their mineral rights for $6,000, and only then discovered that they owned only one-third of the mineral rights. This forced them to renegotiate the contract price to $2,000. The original grantors (who owned the other two-thirds interest in the land) never exercised any rights to the land. The Browns sued Lober (defendant), as executor for the estate of the Bosts, for damages, alleging a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment. The trial court ruled in Lober’s favor. The appellate court reversed, and Lober appealed to the Supreme Court of Illinois.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Underwood, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 204,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.