Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Brown v. McDavid

676 P.2d 714 (1983)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...

Brown v. McDavid

Colorado Court of Appeals

676 P.2d 714 (1983)

Facts

Lewis, George, and J. Donald Yager (defendants) owned land that was referred to as Devil’s Thumb Ranch. In 1973, the Yagers contracted with B.J.R. Associates (BJR) (defendant) to develop and sell Devil’s Thumb Ranch. The ranch was divided into 26 separate lots. In 1974, five lots were sold to five parties, including Jack Bennett. The purchase contracts between BJR and the five parties contained a document with restrictive covenants. This document stated that the covenants would run with the land and discussed certain easements reserved to all owners, such as easements for access and utility purposes. The covenant document also permitted termination of the covenants if the owners of 66 percent of the lots consented to termination. In 1976, Mackintosh and Sylvia Brown (plaintiffs) acquired Bennett’s lot. The Browns made a request for an easement pursuant to the covenant document, which was denied by BJR and the Yagers. The Browns subsequently brought suit against BJR and the Yagers, seeking to enforce the covenant document. Following the filing of the suit, Don McDavid (defendant) bought the remaining lots, becoming the owner of 21 of the 26 lots. In 1977, McDavid recorded a document that terminated the covenant document. McDavid was then made a party to the suit. The trial court found that the covenants were perpetual, not terminable. McDavid appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 34,000 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership