Brown v. Penland Construction Company

641 S.E.2d 522 (2007)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brown v. Penland Construction Company

Georgia Supreme Court
641 S.E.2d 522 (2007)

EL

Facts

After negotiations with a local high school’s baseball coach, Michael Brown (defendant), Penland Construction Company (the builder) (plaintiff) undertook a construction project to build indoor batting cages for a high school. After the batting cages were completed, the high school’s county board of education refused to pay for the batting cages. The builder sued the board of education, the school district, and the school’s boosters club (collectively, the school organizations) (defendants) and Brown under the doctrine of quantum meruit in state trial court. Brown and the school organizations filed motions for directed verdicts. The trial court denied the motions. A jury awarded the builder $150,000, finding Brown and the school organizations jointly and severally liable under the theory of quantum meruit. The state appellate court affirmed. Brown asked the Georgia Supreme Court to reconsider his motion for a directed verdict, arguing the principle of sovereign immunity insulated him from the builder’s claims. Brown argued that any claims of quantum meruit against him personally should fail because he was not unjustly enriched by the batting cages. Brown argued he obtained no special benefit from the facility outside of his role as a coach. Brown also argued he did not own the land on which the batting cages were constructed. Brown further argued that because he was a school employee, he was not personally liable for any claims against the school. The Georgia Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider Brown’s motion for a directed verdict.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Melton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership