Brown v. Poway Unified School District

843 P.2d 624 (1993)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brown v. Poway Unified School District

California Supreme Court
843 P.2d 624 (1993)

Facts

Francis Brown (plaintiff) was a self-employed computer repairman who was delivering computers to a Poway Unified School District (the district) (defendant) building. The building was kept locked, and a district employee had to unlock the door to let nonemployees in. On his fifth trip carrying computers into the building, Brown slipped on a piece of lunchmeat and fell in the hallway. In addition to district employees, two other visitors, both equipment vendors, were in the hallway before Brown’s fall. No one saw a piece of lunchmeat on the floor. An employee picnic area was nearby, but no one had seen anyone eating there that morning. Students were not present in this area. Brown filed a negligence action against the district, and the district moved for summary judgment, arguing that Brown could not show that the district had created the dangerous condition. Brown argued that res ipsa loquitur applied. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the district. The appellate court reversed and held that res ipsa loquitur did apply. The district appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Panelli, J.)

Dissent (Mosk, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership