Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Brown v. Woolf

United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
554 F.Supp. 1206 (1983)


Facts

Bob Woolf (defendant) was the agent for professional hockey player Andrew Brown (plaintiff) and negotiated a contract on Brown’s behalf with the National Hockey League’s (NHL) Pittsburgh Penguins for the 1973-74 season. In July 1974, the Penguins offered Brown a guaranteed two-year contract worth $80,000 per year. Woolf advised Brown to reject the offer and, instead, sign with the recently-developed World Hockey League’s (WHL) Indianapolis Pacers. The Pacers offered Brown a five-year guaranteed contract worth $160,000 per season, totaling $800,000. However, financial difficulties plagued the Pacers and they were eventually forced to re-negotiate Brown’s salary with Woolf. Brown ended up collecting just $185,000 of the entire $800,000 on the contract. However, the Pacers agreed to pay Woolf’s 5 percent fee applied to the entire $800,000 contract promise—a total of $40,000. Brown brought suit against Woolf alleging both constructive fraud and breach of fiduciary duty for failing to investigate the Pacer’s financial condition while receiving his entire fee. Woolf filed motions for partial summary judgment and summary dismissal of the suit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Steckler, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.