Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Jacobson

713 F.2d 262 (1983)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Jacobson

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
713 F.2d 262 (1983)

Play video

Facts

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (Brown) (plaintiff) is a manufacturer of Viceroy cigarettes. Walter Jacobson (defendant) is a news commentator for WBBM-TV, a Chicago television station owned by CBS (defendant). In 1975, an advertising firm came up with its “Kennan plan” to sell Viceroys to young people by marketing them in the same category as other “vices” such as wine, beer, shaving, “wearing a bra, or purposely not wearing one.” Brown rejected this advertising idea and chose not to pursue the Kennan plan of advertising. Years later, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) conducted a study of cigarette advertising. It issued a report suggesting that Brown adopted the Kennan plan as a strategy to market its cigarettes to young people by advertising them as part of a general hedonistic lifestyle. In 1981, a reporter from WBBM-TV called Brown and said he was putting together a story on cigarette advertising for a news program hosted by Walter Jacobson. When asked to comment on the FTC report, a Brown executive said his company rejected the Kennan plan of advertising. However, the Jacobson news program ran the story and included a summary of the FTC’s report. The result of this was an overall suggestion that Brown marketed its cigarettes to children under the Kennan plan. Brown brought suit against Jacobson and CBS for libel. The trial court issued judgment for Jacobson and CBS, and Brown appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership