Browning v. Commissioner

109 T.C. 303 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Browning v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
109 T.C. 303 (1997)

Facts

Charles and Patricia Browning (plaintiffs) engaged in litigation with the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) over the IRS’s claim that the Brownings failed to pay sufficient income tax from 1990 to 1993. The claim arose from a charitable contribution claimed by the Brownings on their federal tax returns after they voluntarily conveyed a restriction easement in perpetuity on their land to Howard County, Maryland, pursuant to the county’s Agricultural Land Preservation Program (Program). The county paid the Brownings $309,000 for the easement, which prohibited development of the land beyond agricultural uses. The Brownings and county officials acknowledged that $309,000 was less than the easement’s fair market value (FMV) and thus constituted a bargain sale, in which part of the conveyance was by sale and part was by gift. The Brownings claimed their gift to the county amounted to over $250,000, based on their experts’ testimony. The IRS countered that the FMV of the easement was simply the price paid by the county, such that there was no bargain sale, no gift, and no charitable contribution to be claimed. Alternatively, the IRS claimed that the FMV of the easement was far less than the Brownings claimed, and they still owed taxes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Halpern, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership