Browning v. Mountain States Coal Corp.
Kentucky Court of Appeals
338 S.W.2d 220 (1960)
- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
Several landowners (plaintiffs) owned six tracts of land and entered a lease with a coal company to allow the coal company to mine the land. Under the lease, the coal company was obligated to pay annual minimum royalties of annually increasing amounts. At the time the parties entered the lease, they knew that the coal was unlikely to be profitable due to its poor quality. The coal company went bankrupt, and its interest was eventually assigned to the Mountain States Coal Corporation (Mountain States) (defendant). Under the terms of the lease, if the original coal company went bankrupt, the landowners had the right to void the lease. Later testimony indicated that one of the landowners (who later died) had allowed Mountain States to mine the land for whatever it could find. Over several years, Mountain States mined small amounts of coal. Mountain States paid a small royalty per ton of coal mined but did not pay the annual minimum royalties. The landowners then sued for the annual minimum royalties. Mountain States responded with two arguments: (1) there was no mineable or merchantable coal under the land, so it was not obligated to pay the minimum royalties, and (2) the lease had terminated due to the landowner’s statement that Mountain States could mine what it could, which indicated that the landowners had voided the lease when the original coal company went bankrupt. The trial court sided with Mountain States, and the landowners appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Moremen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.