Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

Broyhill v. DeLuca

United States Bankruptcy Court of the Eastern District of Virginia
194 B.R. 65 (1996)


Facts

Joel T. Broyhill (plaintiff) and Robert and Marilyn DeLuca (defendants) created a limited liability company (LLC) called D & B Countryside, L.L.C. (D&B). The operating agreement required unanimous agreement of all members to appoint a manager but contained no provision on removal. The DeLucas were named managers. The agreement stated that the company would be dissolved by a set date or on the happening of certain events, including the bankruptcy of a partner. In such an event, the remaining members had the option to continue the business and appoint a new manager. The DeLucas offered Northern Virginia Realty, Inc. (NVRI) (plaintiff) a 15 percent share of D&B. Under the amended operating agreement, NVRI received seven and a half percent of both Broyhill’s and the DeLucas’ share. Broyhill did not sign the agreement but did not object. The DeLucas transferred D&B money to outside accounts and placed a $3 million deed of trust against D&B’s property without the other members’ knowledge. Broyhill and NVRI met and signed an agreement to remove the DeLucas as managers and elect Broyhill. The DeLucas filed chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions on behalf of themselves and D&B. Broyhill and NVRI executed an agreement to continue the business and elect Broyhill manager. Broyhill and NVRI requested a declaration that the DeLucas were validly removed as D&B’s managers and that Broyhill was validly made manager.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Mitchell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 136,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.