Bruce Springsteen v. Jeff Burgar and Bruce Springsteen Fan Club
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
Case # D2000-1532 (2001)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
Jeff Burgar (defendant) registered the website brucespringsteen.com. When Internet users entered brucespringsteen.com, they would be redirected to Burgar’s own site about celebrities. As part of the domain-name registration process, Burgar agreed to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). Under the UDRP, Burgar agreed that if anyone claimed there was a problem with the domain name, Burgar would submit to administrative proceedings before a private panel of experts in domain-name law. Bruce Springsteen (plaintiff) owned and operated brucespringsteen.net. Springsteen submitted a claim under the UDRP, arguing that Burgar’s use of the domain name brucespringsteen.com violated Springsteen’s common law right to his own name.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harris)
Dissent (Page)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.