Bruce v. Helvering
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
76 F.2d 442 (1935)
- Written by Heather Ryfa, JD
Facts
Elizabeth Bruce (plaintiff) owned 700 shares of E. E. Bruce & Company (Bruce Co.); Bruce’s sister also owned 700 shares, with the remainder owned by current and former employees of the company. The sisters desired to reduce their investments in Bruce Co. The sisters were approached by Churchill Drug Company (Churchill), which offered to purchase 200 shares from each of the sisters for $96,000 cash. The offer was accepted. Immediately after the sale, the president of Churchill informed the sisters that Churchill intended to merge the two corporations and offered to exchange 2,400 shares of its stock for the sisters’ remaining stock in Bruce Co. The sisters had not been aware of the merger plan, but after consideration, they accepted the offer, which was completed on the same day as the initial purchase. Bruce reported the first transaction as a sale of stock and the second transaction as a separate tax-exempt exchange on her tax return. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) issued a notice of deficiency for $4,000 based on combining the two transactions into one. Bruce appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Groner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.